However he decides that the leprechauns must have been a dream, so the readers know that he is wrong about having killed Ben Grimm, but I think he continues to mope about it. However, he then needs to become Thing again to save his life, and so uses his last wish to change back to Thing. Strangely, only two issues later, some leprechauns grant him 3 wishes, and he uses one of them to change back to Ben. Thing responds that this is no longer true, expressing his belief that while he knows everything that happened on Battleworld for the past few issues has been a figment of his imagination, he thinks that when he killed the imaginary evil Ben Grimm, he killed the Ben Grimm side of him.
Why don't you go back and retcon that one with some Space Phantoms, Kurt?Īs discussed, in this issue Reed tells Thing that he can change back to Ben at any time. So, in conclusion, it definitely doesn't reflect badly on you 20 years later to have written a book that insisted on a homeless person smelling because ultimately he DOES smell "pretty damn bad".Īnd anyway it's only the famous jerks like Spider-Man and Firestar who refuse to sit near him and, of course, those "concerned Christians". We basically know nothing about them and what little we're told here was discounted and rendered suspect by Peter David claiming it was all a hoax in a throwaway line. These Tribunal have no apparent connection with the Living Tribunal.
There was a discussion on this at the Gentlemen of Leisure website a while back- someone argued that while Rogue is in the driver's seat and not Carol, she has Carol's memories of flying but not her reflexes, which makes her a poor pilot. Also, didn't Johnny do this same scare-a-student thing in another book? I recall enough to say for sure he did. Two things: Evil Reed at the end reminded me of the Counter-Earth Reed/Brute story.
0 kommentar(er)
